IWPR Home institute for war & peace reporting
   
 Advanced Search
building peace and democracy through free and fair media

Home
Programmes
Afghanistan
Afghan Recovery Report
Africa
Zimbabwe Crisis Reports
Caucasus
Caucasus Reporting Service
Cross Caucasus Network
Central Asia
Reporting Central Asia
News Briefing Central Asia
Human Rights Reporting
Central Asia Radio
International Justice
ICC - Africa Update
ICTY - Tribunal Update
Face à la Justice - RD Congo
Facing Justice - Uganda
On the Scale - Darfur
Iran
Mianeh Reports
Iraq
Iraqi Crisis Report
Metro
Pakistan
Open Minds
Philippines
Human Rights Reporting
Syria
Syria News Briefing
Multimedia
Resources
Books
Training
IWPR Comment
Kurt Schork Awards
Photo Galleries
Sahar Fund
Past Programmes
Past Publications
CIJ Trial Reports Archive
Links
RSS Feeds
Other IWPR sites
Mianeh
Open Minds Pakistan
Regional Media Network
Rights Reporting
IWPR on acebook
witter
 



ICTY - Tribunal Update
International Justice / ICTY home
Courtside

Witness Says Belgrade Sent Army to Sarajevo

Bos-Hrv-Srp

He claims special unit came to capital to transport bodies of dead Yugoslav army soldiers home.

By Rachel Irwin in The Hague (TU No 579, 28-Nov-08)

A former senior officer in the Yugoslav Army, VJ, testified this week that orders sending him to Sarajevo during the Bosnian war could only have come from the defendant, ex-Yugoslav army chief Momcilo Perisic.

The witness, General Borivoje Tesic, told the Hague tribunal that his unit had pushed into a suburb of Sarajevo in December 1993 following orders passed on from his commander Miodrag Panic.

After wondering aloud whether Panic would have had the authority to send VJ troops into independent Bosnia, prosecutor Ann Sutherland asked Tesic specifically who would have issued the original order.

“I suppose it would have come from the general staff,” replied Tesic.

“And who was the highest-ranking officer?” asked Sutherland.

“The chief of the general staff was General Perisic,” said the witness.

Tesic’s testimony supported the prosecution’s assertion that the VJ – headed by Perisic –was active in Sarajevo during the 44-month siege of the city.

Prosecutors allege that the accused secretly provided officers, weapons, fuel and logistical assistance to Bosnian Serb forces during relentless shelling and sniper attacks that killed thousands of civilians.

Perisic, head of the VJ from 1993 to 1998, is charged with 13 counts of crimes against humanity and violations of the laws of war, including the aiding and abetting of murder and inhumane attacks against civilians from 1993 to 1995 during the siege of Sarajevo and shelling of Zagreb, and in the 1995 Srebrenica massacre.

According to the indictment, Perisic allegedly acted in secret, since VJ military involvement in the Bosnian and Croatian conflicts was in breach of United Nations Security Council resolutions, and because “such assistance was being used in the commission of crimes” on civilians.

The defendant is also accused of setting up special personnel centres “to disguise the provision and payment” of VJ officers stationed in Bosnia and Croatia.

Tesic was an operations officer in the VJ Guards Brigade special unit at the end of 1993, when Sarajevo was under siege by the Bosnian Serbs.

He told the Hague tribunal that the purpose of the December 30, 1993, mission to the Sarajevo suburb of Vogosca was to “help pull out the 72nd special brigade” of the VJ from the area and transport eight dead soldiers back to Belgrade.

The prosecutor questioned Tesic about the “war diary” kept by the Guards Brigade and any contact the unit had with VJ headquarters in Belgrade during the Vogosca mission.

“We sent daily reports [to Belgrade] in the morning hours and evening hours,” said Tesic.

He added that the unit was “duty bound” to record all operations “minute by minute” in the war diary, and that he contributed to the documentation himself.

“Was it protocol for this information to be passed further up the chain of command?” asked Sutherland.

“I suppose so, yes,” said Tesic, who appeared calm and solemn during questioning.

In the course of his testimony, he also confirmed the existence of snipers in his unit at the time of the Vogosca mission, and said that his unit probably trained them.

Sutherland wondered if it was normal for a short mission to employ 120 men and an abundance of heavy, armoured equipment.

“We found [the tanks] there [in Vogosca],” answered Tesic. “The rest of the weaponry was normally in possession of the army.”

He also said that all of the VJ soldiers wore their own uniforms during the mission, and claimed he never heard of any orders to the contrary.

“Were you ordered to remove the insignia of the VJ?” asked Sutherland.

“I don’t know,” replied Tesic. “I don’t remember if I even wore insignia.”

Nearly all of the witness’s testimony – for the prosecution and defence – was given in closed session, due to the confidential nature of the various documents discussed.

The trial continues next week.

Rachel Irwin is an IWPR reporter in The Hague.

Feedback Form
IWPR greatly appreciates your feedback. Please tick the boxes where appropriate:
After reading the article I am more informed on the subject matter
The article influenced my view on the ICTY and/or international justice
I intend to use what I learned (in my work)
My work/education is in the field of:
IWPR may contact me to follow up
Your name (optional):
Your E-mail address (optional):



Subscribe
Past Reports
MonthIssue No.
Mar637-638
Feb633-636
Jan630-632
MonthIssue No.
Dec627-629
Nov623-626
Oct618-622
Sep614-617
Aug612-613
Jul609-611
Archive 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 00 99 98 97 96
Highlights
Images of Iraq’s Election
New Episodes:
A Window on Syria
reviewProject Review Dec '09/Jan '10
reviewNew Issues: Metro
Vacancies Available
On the Scale - DarfurOn the Scale - Darfur
Kurt Schork Award Winners
A Handbook on Covering War Crimes Courts
In the News
Star TribuneIraq appears to be headed for a political deadlock that could lead to security problems and deepen sectarian rifts, say IWPR reporters Ali Kareem and Hemin H Lihony.
Relief WebResidents of several [Iraqi] provinces told IWPR that political parties had resorted to handing out bribes including food, mobile phones or even government posts to win votes.
Hurriyet DailyResidents of Georgian port city of Poti say dust blown from shipments of aluminum oxide is damaging their health, IWPR reported on its website.
Winnipeg Free Press"Now [the Taleban] appear to be able to launch their attacks even in the most heavily protected sections of [Kabul], "said IWPR Afghan project editor/trainer Jean MacKenzie.
Past Highlights
Interview: Tribunal president on court’s completion strategy
Interview: ICJ Chief on Bosnia Genocide Case
A Handbook for Local Journalists in Crisis Areas
Introduction to the Hague Tribunal
Online Help
Guides to international law and language:
Legal Dictionary of Terms
Dictionary of International Law
Law.com Dictionary
Support
To support IWPR's work, contact Ria Burghardt, or make an ONLINE DONATION >>
IWPR thanks the following for their generous support:
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Norway Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Norway
Swedish International Development and Cooperation Agency (SIDA)Swedish Agency for International Development Cooperation (Sida)
Foreign and Commonwealth Office (UK)Foreign and Commonwealth Office, UK


© Institute for War & Peace Reporting
48 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8LT, UK
Tel: +44 (0)20 7831 1030    Fax: +44 (0)20 7831 1050

The opinions expressed in IWPR Online are those of the authors and do not
necessarily represent those of the Institute for War and Peace Reporting.

Registered as a charity in the United Kingdom (charity reg. no: 1027201, company reg. no: 2744185)