IWPR institute for war & peace reporting
About IWPR | Programmes | Get Involved | Donate | Republish | Vacancies | Contact Us  
building peace and democracy through free and fair media

IWPR homepage
Programmes
Afghanistan
Africa
Caucasus
Central Asia
News Briefing Central Asia
International Justice / ICC
International Justice / ICTY
Iraq
Iraq Radio
Philippines
Face a la Justice
Syria
Cross Caucasus Journalism Network
Iran
 
Resources
Training Resources homepage
Training
Special Reports
Special Reports
Archive
Archive
Links
Links
Letters
Letters
 



ICTY - Tribunal Update
International Justice / ICTY home
Courtside

Croats “Destroyed” Village in Medak Operation

Bos-Hrv-Srp

Prosecution witness tells court Citluk was leveled to the ground during 1993 Medak Pocket offensive.

By Goran Jungvirth in Zagreb (TU No 523, 26-Oct-07)

A witness testifying under protected measures told the war crimes trial of two Croatian generals, Generals Mirko Norac and Rahim Ademi, that Croat soldiers had destroyed his village, despite the absence of Serb forces.

According to “witness number eight”, the first Serb witness to testify under protective measures in the case, residents of the village of Citluk were woken by explosions and only managed to survive by fleeing before the troops arrived.

Generals Norac and Ademi are on trial in Zagreb for war crimes allegedly committed by Croatian troops under their command during fighting to seize a Serb-held area of land called the Medak Pocket in September 1993.

The indictment originally brought by the Hague tribunal alleges that at least 29 Serb civilians were killed and dozens were seriously injured during the operation. Many of the killed and wounded civilians were women and elderly people.

It further states that Croatian forces killed at least five Serb soldiers who had been captured or wounded.

This week, the witness said he wanted “to thank Mr Norac for firing shells first, since that had forced us out of bed and let us know we needed to run”.

He said he doubted that he would still be alive if it hadn’t been for the explosions.

The witness told the court that he only returned when United Nations soldiers entered the village after the Croatian retreat.

“It wasn’t there at all. If even the outdoor toilets were destroyed then you can imagine what it was like. Not one house, not one barn was left standing from around 60 households,” he said.

Norac said there had been Serb forces in the village, and it had been a legitimate military target.

“There was an entire company in Citluk, a mortar unit and soldiers were billeted in the houses,” said the accused general.

But the witness said that there had been no Serb forces in the village, except for one guard “who didn’t have any weapons, apart from a rifle. The population was civilian, mostly women and old people”.

He blamed the Croat forces for destroying the houses, and said that civilians had been killed - although he personally did not witness this.

“One person was burned, one person was slaughtered and one person was pulled along behind a car,” he said.

Before the witness testified, the court chairman read out a UN police report on the Croatian army’s Medak Pocket operation.

The report, dated October 10, 1993, said police had found 19 corpses in the area, including ten men, eight women and one whose gender they could not determine.

Five of the corpses were burned, and four of them had been women.

It also said 312 buildings were destroyed, including 164 houses and 148 were barns or outhouses.

Serb houses had been looted or destroyed, cattle killed and the wells poisoned with oil or animal carcasses.

The UN police also mentioned that they had not included information about 52 bodies that the Croatian army had handed over to the Serbs after they captured the area.

In none of the villages did the police find any living person and in the village of Drljici “only a few chickens were left alive”, said the report, which added that UN police found several Croatian soldiers there in police uniforms.

Goran Jungvirth is an IWPR journalist in Zagreb.

to top
Tribunal home



Donate
PAST REPORTS
MonthIssue No.
Nov576-579
Oct571-575
Sep567-570
Aug563-566
Jul558-562
Jun554-557
May550-553
Archive 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 00 99 98 97 96
Advanced Search
HIGHLIGHTS
Winners of the 2008 Kurt Schork Awards
UN Resists Pressure to Extend Hague Court's Term
Karadzic Indictment Controversy
Prosecutors Seek to Streamline Karadzic Indictment
Special Report:
What Will Karadzic Trial Draw From Milosevic Case?
IWPR Comment Section
A Handbook on Covering War Crimes Courts
Sahar Journalists’ Assistance Fund
IN THE NEWS
"The Hague - based Institute for War & Peace Reporting has released a series of special reports about crimes of sexual violence in the DRC." said IRIN.
“The noose is tightening around the Afghan capital and it is no longer possible to ignore the signs,” Jean Mackenzie, IWPR Afghanistan country director, told the Independent.
IWPR Iraq country director Hiwa Osman speaks to the BBC about plans to expand journalism training in Baghdad.
“We urgently need to train journalists [in Iraq] to give the full picture - away from political, religious or sectarian bias," said Hiwa Osman, Iraq country director.
“Many (Afghans) make the pragmatic decision to support the insurgents, since they cannot rely on protection from NATO," says Afghanistan country director Jean Mackenzie.
IWPR reporter Simon Jennings discusses the indictment against former Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadzic at the Hague tribunal.
"The scale and plight of evacuees and refugees [in southern Mindanao] is every bit as bad as Georgia - but nobody is much paying attention," IWPR’s Philippines project director Alan Davis told the BBC.
“The Caucasus is the kind of place where, when the guns start firing, it's hard to stop them. That is the brutal reality of South Ossetia...,” writes IWPR Caucasus editor Thomas de Waal.
PAST HIGHLIGHTS
Interview: Tribunal president on court’s completion strategy
Interview: ICJ Chief on Bosnia Genocide Case
>A Handbook for Local Journalists in Crisis Areas
>Introduction to the Hague Tribunal
ONLINE HELP
Guides to international law and language:
Legal Dictionary of Terms
Dictionary of International Law
Law.com Dictionary
SUPPORT
To support IWPR's work, contact Ria Burghardt, or make an ONLINE DONATION >>
IWPR thanks the following for their generous support:
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Norway Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Norway
Swedish International Development and Cooperation Agency (SIDA)Swedish Agency for International Development Cooperation (Sida)
Foreign and Commonwealth Office (UK)Foreign and Commonwealth Office, UK


© Institute for War & Peace Reporting
48 Grays Inn Road, London WC1X 8LT, UK
Tel: +44 (0)20 7831 1030    Fax: +44 (0)20 7831 1050

The opinions expressed in IWPR Online are those of the authors and do not
necessarily represent those of the Institute for War and Peace Reporting.

Registered as a charity in the United Kingdom (charity reg. no: 1027201, company reg. no: 2744185)