IWPR Home institute for war & peace reporting
   
 Advanced Search
building peace and democracy through free and fair media

Home
Programmes
Afghanistan
Afghan Recovery Report
Africa
Zimbabwe Crisis Reports
Caucasus
Caucasus Reporting Service
Cross Caucasus Network
Central Asia
Reporting Central Asia
News Briefing Central Asia
Human Rights Reporting
Central Asia Radio
International Justice
ICC - Africa Update
ICTY - Tribunal Update
Face à la Justice - RD Congo
Facing Justice - Uganda
On the Scale - Darfur
Iran
Mianeh Reports
Iraq
Iraqi Crisis Report
Metro
Pakistan
Open Minds
Philippines
Human Rights Reporting
Syria
Syria News Briefing
Multimedia
Resources
Books
Training
IWPR Comment
Kurt Schork Awards
Photo Galleries
Sahar Fund
Past Programmes
Past Publications
CIJ Trial Reports Archive
Links
RSS Feeds
Other IWPR sites
Mianeh
Open Minds Pakistan
Regional Media Network
Rights Reporting
IWPR on acebook
witter
 



Reporting Central Asia
Central Asia home

Nuclear Fallout Persists in Kazakstan

Russian

Effects of Soviet atom bomb blasts still affecting population around disused test site.

By Elmira Gabidullina in Almaty (RCA No. 550, 18-Sep-08)

Kazakstan’s nuclear test zone has lain deserted for the last 20 years and largely forgotten by the outside world, but experts say radiation will continue to be a health risk until the huge site is cleaned up thoroughly.

The testing ground was closed for use in 1991. This month, the international Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty Organisation is running a series of trials at the Semipalatinsk site to test equipment that can identify and give the location of nuclear explosions.

Semipalatinsk was clearly chosen for the experiments because some of the testing can be done for real, for example checking radiation levels in the soil and atmosphere. In Kazakstan, it is also being seen as a tribute to the country’s decision, soon after it became independent, to become the first state to voluntarily renounce nuclear weapons.

The persistence of high background radiation means the legacy of Semipalatinsk lives on. Academic researchers and pressure groups say the incidence of cancer, congenital defects, retarded development and psychiatric disorders in the surrounding are much higher than in other parts of Kazakstan.

According to the cancer centre for East Kazakstan Region, the disease occurs 10 to 15 per cent more frequently than the national average, with a high proportion of cases falling within the 50-60 year-old age bracket, in other words people who would have been around when nuclear testing was taking place.

Above-ground blasts ended in 1962, but underground testing continued for many years until the programme ended in 1989.

Some 1.7 million people are believed to have health problems caused by exposure to radiation.

These days, the radiation is at much lower levels. But experts warn that low doses and constant exposure can show up as genetic malformations. This is likely to persist until a complete clean-up is conducted over this vast area.

Aytkoja Bigaliev, director of the Ecology Institute at Kazakstan’s Al-Farabi University and a long-time researcher of the problem, says that the key task is to curb radiation in soil and water. Subsoil water carries away and distributes radioactive material left inside the now derelict underground shafts where explosions were carried out. In time, this material finds its way into the food chain and affects both animals and humans

Matters are made worse, said Bigaliev, by the fact that little action is taken to stop people pasturing their livestock, collecting salt and mining coal on polluted land. This results in radioactive substances being transported to other parts of Kazakstan. He blames the problem on a mixture of popular ignorance and a lack of laws specifically outlawing such practices.

“Radiation levels on the polygon are 1,000 times the permissible amount,” he said. “They put their livestock out to pasture there without let or hindrance, and the meat and milk then ends up on people’s tables.”

Bakhyt Tumenova, director of the non-government pressure group on health matters called Aman Saulik, says one of the problems is that no one has really kept track of how people have been affected.

“It’s of pressing importance to determine the real impact of radiation,” she said. “Initially they determined the damage level by the simple principle of [looking at people] directly affected by radiation. But that’s inaccurate.”

Tumenov said that by contrast, Japan had used a “reconstructive” model which looked at the continuing effects of initial radiation and allowed a more accurate estimate of future problems.

As well as local residents, soldiers stationed near where the nuclear blasts took place in Soviet times say they are still living with the effects.

Back in 1962, Melgis Metov was a young conscript based four kilometres outside the testing zone or “polygon” as it is known here. His job was to prepare the monitoring equipment and take meter readings immediately after the blast.

In the year he spent there, 19 tests took place – 18 of them under ground and the other the even more dangerous type where the bomb was set off above ground.

“The polygon has cursed my life,” said Metov, who lives in Kazakstan’s second city and heads a committee of army veterans who served in “high risk units”.

He and the three other soldiers detailed for the job had only basic chemical-warfare kit – a gas mask and a protective cape.

Within a couple of months they were suffering splitting headaches and exhaustion, and discoloured spots appeared on their skin. On doctors’ orders, they were transferred to another role elsewhere, but Metov continued to have the headaches. By the time he was 30, he had a nervous tic and was losing his sight – he now has limited vision in only one eye.

He had to retire early, and says, “I might have achieved more than I did in life if the polygon hadn’t come my way.”

Metov’s commission has tried over many years to get the authorities to recognise the particular risks the nuclear troops underwent.

He pulls out a fat file of letters from various official institutions turning down the veterans’ request on the grounds that they are not eligible.

Kazakstan has a law dating from 1992 which sets out the benefits available to people who suffered as a result of nuclear testing. But strangely, it does not appear to cover soldiers who served in and around the test site.

Elmira Gabidullina is a freelance journalist in Almaty.



Subscribe
Past Reports
MonthIssue No.
Mar605-605
Feb602-604
Jan600-601
MonthIssue No.
Dec597-599
Nov594-596
Oct590-593
Sep588-589
Aug586-587
Jul582-585
Jun579-581
May576-578
Archive 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 00
Highlights
Images of Iraq’s Election
New Episodes:
A Window on Syria
reviewProject Review Dec '09/Jan '10
reviewNew Issues: Metro
Vacancies Available
On the Scale - DarfurOn the Scale - Darfur
Kurt Schork Award Winners
Reporter Shortlisted for Regional Prize
In the News
Relief WebResidents of several [Iraqi] provinces told IWPR that political parties had resorted to handing out bribes including food, mobile phones or even government posts to win votes.
Hurriyet DailyResidents of Georgian port city of Poti say dust blown from shipments of aluminum oxide is damaging their health, IWPR reported on its website.
Winnipeg Free Press"Now [the Taleban] appear to be able to launch their attacks even in the most heavily protected sections of [Kabul], "said IWPR Afghan project editor/trainer Jean MacKenzie.
McClatchy"The simple fact is that the condition of the economy has never played a major role in the minds of Iranian leaders or in Iran's national security equation," said IWPR contributor Omid Memarian on the prospect of tougher western sanctions.
BBC“I would like to imagine that at least a few senior politicians woke up this week to seriously wonder what kind of monsters they and their system have created over the years," said IWPR's Head of Asia Alan Davis, referring to Maguindanao massacre.
Support
To support IWPR's work in Central Asia, contact Ria Burghardt, or make an ONLINE DONATION >>
IWPR thanks the following for their generous support:
UK Foreign & Commonwealth OfficeUK Foreign and Commonwealth Office
US Department of StateUS Department of State
Open Society InstituteOpen Society Institute (OSI)



© Institute for War & Peace Reporting
48 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8LT, UK
Tel: +44 (0)20 7831 1030    Fax: +44 (0)20 7831 1050

The opinions expressed in IWPR Online are those of the authors and do not
necessarily represent those of the Institute for War and Peace Reporting.

Registered as a charity in the United Kingdom (charity reg. no: 1027201, company reg. no: 2744185)