IWPR Home institute for war & peace reporting
   
 Advanced Search
building peace and democracy through free and fair media

Home
Programmes
Afghanistan
Afghan Recovery Report
Africa
Zimbabwe Crisis Reports
Caucasus
Caucasus Reporting Service
Cross Caucasus Network
Central Asia
Reporting Central Asia
News Briefing Central Asia
Human Rights Reporting
Central Asia Radio
International Justice
ICC - Africa Update
ICTY - Tribunal Update
Face à la Justice - RD Congo
Facing Justice - Uganda
On the Scale - Darfur
Iran
Mianeh Reports
Iraq
Iraqi Crisis Report
Metro
Pakistan
Open Minds
Philippines
Human Rights Reporting
Syria
Syria News Briefing
Multimedia
Resources
Books
Training
IWPR Comment
Kurt Schork Awards
Photo Galleries
Sahar Fund
Past Programmes
Past Publications
CIJ Trial Reports Archive
Links
RSS Feeds
Other IWPR sites
Mianeh
Open Minds Pakistan
Regional Media Network
Rights Reporting
IWPR on acebook
witter
 



Caucasus Reporting Service
Caucasus home

Poll Violence Alleged in Armenia

Russian

Government-backed candidate beats opposition in reportedly flawed election.

By Gayane Mkrtchyan in Yerevan (CRS No. 527, 15-Jan-10)

A small party, apparently supported by the Armenian government, won a by-election on January 10, seeing off a challenge from a jailed activist amid allegations of violence against the opposition.

But the turn-out was a tiny 24 per cent, suggesting that even the challenge of opposition journalist Nikol Pashinyan – the first time an Armenian has run for election from behind bars – had failed to inspire a cynical electorate.

Ara Simonyan, a candidate from the pro-government National Unity party, won the poll in Yerevan’s 10th electoral district, with 7,622 votes to Pashinyan’s 5,023. The third candidate – Davit Hakobyan, head of the Marxist Party of Armenia – received just 299 votes.

The turn-out of less than a quarter, compared with 53 per cent in the 2007 general election, was disappointing for all parties.

“Even the politicised part of the population did not take part in the election, and this shows that the voters have no hopes for these by-elections. The politicised electorate in the centre of the city is boycotting the elections, and this is very dangerous for the country,” said Viktor Dallayan, an independent member of the Armenian parliament.

President Serzh Sargsyan’s Republican Party, which controls parliament, did not take part in the by-election. The opposition Armenian National Congress, however, which was supporting Pashinyan, and independent observers said the conduct of the poll was biased towards the winner, who had the full support of the government.

Arthur Sakunts, of the Helsinki Civil Assembly which monitored the polling process, said Armenian elections had become a formality and had been so ever since the early 1990s. He said the electorate’s dissatisfaction was visible in the low turn-out.

“Now this tradition has been perfected, using administrative and legal levers,” he said.

Repeated attempts to seek comment from government and city officials failed, but Artashes Geghamyan, leader of the National Unity Party, insisted the vote was free and fair and that his supporters were not responsible for violent attacks on opposition members reported on polling day.

Geghamyan also thanked the three parties represented in Armenia’s government for facilitating his candidate’s victory.

Pashinyan, editor of the Armenian Times, was arrested in July last year after more than a year on the run. He has been accused of a role in organising the mass protests that greeted the election of Sargsyan, and which occupied the centre of the capital until broken up by police on March 1, 2008.

He spent the whole campaign period in detention, his campaign masterminded by political allies. He accused the government of rigging the vote, saying it was a farce that an unknown like Simonyan could win so easily.

“The voting was accompanied by shameful violence, threats, frauds, unplanned closing of polling stations, and these processes continued in conditions of direct or hidden cover from the organs of state, which are obliged to assure the legality of elections,” he said in an angry statement released after the votes were counted.

“As a candidate taking part in the elections of January 10, I regret that I cannot congratulate the man recognised as the victor in the preliminary results, for the reason that the majority of citizens coming to the polling stations did not even know him.”

Various groups sent missions to observe the election, including Armenia’s Young Conservatives, which said it recorded cases of pressure on voters, threats, restrictions on the rights of journalists and observers, and more. It said the authorities seemed incapable of organising a legal election.

In one fight, which took place near polling station 10/09, three members of Pashinyan’s team – including Petros Makeyan, the head of his election staff - were injured. Makeyan said they had been attacked by a group of men with shaved heads.

“And the police officers, instead of stopping the skinheads, held us by the arms, so they could beat us,” he said.

The police disputed the account, saying Makeyan and his allies had themselves attacked a group from Simonyan’s team and took themselves to hospital with the injuries they received as a result.

Police refused to comment on other allegations of irregularities on polling day.

Journalists also complained of their treatment. During a scuffle at polling station 10/19, photographer Gagik Shamshyan said he was punched, while unknown assailants reportedly tried to break a Radio Liberty journalist’s microphone. The chairmen of several polling stations refused to allow reporters inside, saying they would interfere with the electoral process.

Sakunts remarked on the failure of the mainstream media to cover the electoral race.

“Television did not cover this election at all. The population was under an information blockade. The television channels not only refused to report anything on the electoral campaign of the opposition candidate, but also did not report at all on the elections,” he said.

But the channels themselves said there was a simple explanation for the lack of coverage, and that was that most of their employees were on holiday enjoying the New Year break, meaning television could not give the elections the attention they deserved.

“This was not political antipathy, and I can even say I am good friends with Nikol. The only reason for the lack of coverage of the campaign was the holidays,” said Gegham Manukyan, head of new programmes at broadcaster Erkir-Media.

Gayane Mkrtchyan is a journalist from Armenianow.com.



Subscribe
Past Reports
MonthIssue No.
Mar534-535
Feb530-533
Jan526-529
MonthIssue No.
Dec522-525
Nov518-521
Oct513-517
Sep509-512
Aug506-508
Archive 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 00 99
Highlights
Images of Iraq’s Election
New Episodes:
A Window on Syria
reviewProject Review Dec '09/Jan '10
reviewNew Issues: Metro
Vacancies Available
On the Scale - DarfurOn the Scale - Darfur
Kurt Schork Award Winners
Media Bias Claims in Georgia Exposed
Georgia War Anniversary
Karabakh Focus
Karabakh Refugees
Photo Essays
Lessons in Conflict Reporting
Learning About Risk
View more >>
Past Highlights
Learning About Risk
Regional Media Network
Handbook for Local Journalists
War and Peace in the Caucasus
In the News
Relief WebResidents of several [Iraqi] provinces told IWPR that political parties had resorted to handing out bribes including food, mobile phones or even government posts to win votes.
Hurriyet DailyResidents of Georgian port city of Poti say dust blown from shipments of aluminum oxide is damaging their health, IWPR reported on its website.
Winnipeg Free Press"Now [the Taleban] appear to be able to launch their attacks even in the most heavily protected sections of [Kabul], "said IWPR Afghan project editor/trainer Jean MacKenzie.
McClatchy"The simple fact is that the condition of the economy has never played a major role in the minds of Iranian leaders or in Iran's national security equation," said IWPR contributor Omid Memarian on the prospect of tougher western sanctions.
BBC“I would like to imagine that at least a few senior politicians woke up this week to seriously wonder what kind of monsters they and their system have created over the years," said IWPR's Head of Asia Alan Davis, referring to Maguindanao massacre.
Support
To support IWPR's work in Caucasus, contact Ria Burghardt, or make an ONLINE DONATION >>
IWPR thanks the following for their generous support:
Community Fund (UK)Community Fund (UK)
European Commission This project is co-funded by the European Union
Dutch Ministry for Development CooperationDutch Ministry for Development Cooperation
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of DenmarkMinistry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark



© Institute for War & Peace Reporting
48 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8LT, UK
Tel: +44 (0)20 7831 1030    Fax: +44 (0)20 7831 1050

The opinions expressed in IWPR Online are those of the authors and do not
necessarily represent those of the Institute for War and Peace Reporting.

Registered as a charity in the United Kingdom (charity reg. no: 1027201, company reg. no: 2744185)