IWPR Home institute for war & peace reporting
   
 Advanced Search
building peace and democracy through free and fair media

Home
Programmes
Afghanistan
Afghan Recovery Report
Africa
Zimbabwe Crisis Reports
Caucasus
Caucasus Reporting Service
Cross Caucasus Network
Central Asia
Reporting Central Asia
News Briefing Central Asia
Human Rights Reporting
Central Asia Radio
International Justice
ICC - Africa Update
ICTY - Tribunal Update
Face à la Justice - RD Congo
Facing Justice - Uganda
On the Scale - Darfur
Iran
Mianeh Reports
Iraq
Iraqi Crisis Report
Pakistan
Open Minds
Philippines
Human Rights Reporting
Syria
Syria News Briefing
Multimedia
Resources
Books
Training
IWPR Comment
Kurt Schork Awards
Photo Galleries
Sahar Fund
Past Programmes
Past Publications
CIJ Trial Reports Archive
Links
RSS Feeds
Other IWPR sites
Academy
Mianeh
Open Minds Pakistan
Regional Media Network
Rights Reporting
IWPR on acebook
witter
 



ICTY - Tribunal Update
International Justice / ICTY home
Courtside

Ex-Bosnian Army Chief Gets Prison Term

Bos-Hrv-Srp

But judges could not agree on whether General Rasim Delic had effective control over mujahedin.

By Merdijana Sadovic in Sarajevo (TU No 569, 19-Sep-08)

Hague tribunal judges this week sentenced the former Bosnian army chief to three years imprisonment for crimes committed by foreign Muslim fighters, or mujahedin, against captive Bosnian Serb soldiers in 1995.

General Rasim Delic was charged with crimes committed by mujahedin in three separate incidents between 1993 and 1995, but the three-judge panel found him guilty of only one of them.

According to the verdict read out in court on September 15, the trial chamber decided that Delic was guilty “of failing to take the necessary and reasonable measures to prevent and punish the crimes of cruel treatment committed by the El Mujahed Detachment (EMD)…in the village of Livade and in the Kamenica Camp [central Bosnia] in July and August 1995”.

In a summary of the judgement, the judges concluded, “ In specific instances 12 captured members of the Bosnian Serb Army were subjected to various kinds of maltreatment, including severe beatings and electric shocks. The captives were also forced to kiss the severed heads of other detainees.”

The trial chamber found that Delić bore no responsibility for the crime committed in the villages of Maline and Bikosi in the Travnik municipality of central Bosnia in June 1993, when about 24 Bosnian Croat civilians and soldiers were killed and six others injured by the mujahedin. The judges ruled that no superior-subordinate relationship had existed between Delić and the perpetrators at that time.

Delic was also acquitted of charges of cruel treatment and murder in relation to the events that took place in September 1995 in the village of Kesten and Kamenica Camp when members of the EMD killed one elderly Serb man and 52 Bosnian Serb soldiers, as well as abusing 10 others. The trial chamber “could not conclude beyond reasonable doubt that Delić had reason to know that these crimes were about to be or were committed”.

At the end of his trial in June this year, the prosecutors demanded 15 years imprisonment for Delic, while the defence called for an acquittal.

Delic’s defence counsel Vasvija Vidovic told IWPR her team would appeal the verdict. Spokeswoman for the tribunal’s prosecutors, Olga Kavran, said it was "too early" for the prosecution to say whether they will file an appeal, because they first want to read the judgement carefully. They have 30 days to do so.

Delić, who took the post of the commander of the main staff of the Bosnian army in June 1993, is one of the most senior military commanders tried before the Hague tribunal on charges of superior criminal responsibility for the crimes of murder and cruel treatment.

The proceedings against him started in July 2007. Central to this case was whether the general had effective command and control over mujahedin fighters.

In the summer of 1992, the first foreign Muslim fighters arrived in the areas of Travnik and Zenica in central Bosnia, to fight on the Bosniak side. During the trial, many prosecution and defence witnesses told the court that mujahedin were very independent and did not obey orders from the Bosnian army staff.

In an attempt to put these unruly units under the Bosnian army control, on August 13, 1993 General Delic signed an order authorising the formation of a detachment named “El Mujahedin”. Following its establishment, the EMD significantly grew in size and by 1995 it comprised approximately several hundred fighters.

In their decision announced this week, the judges said they were “satisfied that from the time of its establishment in August 1993 until its disbandment in December 1995, the EMD had been a unit de jure subordinated to the ABiH (Bosnian army) 3rd Corps or to one of the units that had been subordinated in turn to the ABiH 3rd Corps. Since Rasim Delic was the de jure superior of the 3rd Corps, it follows that the EMD was de jure subordinated to Rasim Delic”.

However, the judges could not agree on whether Delic had effective control over this unit at any time related to the indictment.

Two of the judges found that “the structure, organisation and command and control within the ABiH had improved significantly from the time when Rasim Delic had been appointed as Commander of the Main Staff on 8 June 1993 until the EMD had been disbanded in December 1995 at the end of the armed conflict in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In the majority’s view, when the crimes were committed in Livade and Kamenica in July and September 1995, Rasim Delić was in a consolidated position which enabled him to enforce his decisions upon his subordinates, including the EMD and its members”.

However, in a dissenting opinion, Presiding judge Bacone Moloto held the view that Delic “did not have effective control over the EMD at any time from the time of his assumption of duties as the Commander of the Main Staff of the ABiH…until the EMD was disbanded”.

He also noted that the EMD throughout 1995 erratically complied with the Bosnian army orders.

“The EMD carried out the tasks given by the ABiH only when it chose to do so. The evidence shows that the issuing of ABiH orders was preceded by an ‘agreement’ with the EMD, and this was inconsistent with the system of command and control,” noted Judge Moloto.

He added that the majority of the judges seemed to draw Delic’s effective control from the fact that he did not take measures against the EMD, while he could do so. But, according to Judge Moloto, “Delic’s inaction only confirmed, in light of the totality of the evidence, the absence of his effective control”.

Judge Moloto also recalled that, despite the fact that the ABiH, on some occasions, took investigative steps against EMD members, “all attempts to punish [them] for their criminal behaviour inevitably failed”.

Delic’s defence council Vasvija Vidovic told IWPR she was very encouraged by Judge Moloto’s dissenting opinion.

“What Judge Moloto said is exactly the position of the defence in this case. We have argued from the very beginning of this trial that General Delic did not have effective control over mujahedin, and it seems Judge Moloto has taken the same view,” said Vidovic.

Merdijana Sadovic is IWPR’s Hague tribunal manager. IWPR’s reporter in The Hague Simon Jennings contributed to this report.

Feedback Form
IWPR greatly appreciates your feedback. Please tick the boxes where appropriate:
After reading the article I am more informed on the subject matter
The article influenced my view on the ICTY and/or international justice
I intend to use what I learned (in my work)
My work/education is in the field of:
IWPR may contact me to follow up
Your name (optional):
Your E-mail address (optional):



Subscribe
Past Reports
MonthIssue No.
Feb633-633
Jan630-632
MonthIssue No.
Dec627-629
Nov623-626
Oct618-622
Sep614-617
Aug612-613
Jul608-611
Jun604-607
Archive 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 00 99 98 97 96
Highlights
Facing Justice - UgandaFacing Justice - Uganda
Vacancies Available
On the Scale - DarfurOn the Scale - Darfur
Project Review Oct/Nov 2009
Kurt Schork Awards Videos
Kurt Schork Award Winners
A Handbook on Covering War Crimes Courts
In the News
Winnipeg Free Press"Now [the Taleban] appear to be able to launch their attacks even in the most heavily protected sections of [Kabul], "said IWPR Afghan project editor/trainer Jean MacKenzie.
McClatchy"The simple fact is that the condition of the economy has never played a major role in the minds of Iranian leaders or in Iran's national security equation," said IWPR contributor Omid Memarian on the prospect of tougher western sanctions.
BBC“I would like to imagine that at least a few senior politicians woke up this week to seriously wonder what kind of monsters they and their system have created over the years," said IWPR's Head of Asia Alan Davis, referring to Maguindanao massacre.
The New York TimesRecent double bombing in Baghdad has cast doubt on the government's ability to guarantee security and prompted fears such violence may affect voter turnout in anticipated January elections, writes iWPR reporter Ali Karim.
Past Highlights
Interview: Tribunal president on court’s completion strategy
Interview: ICJ Chief on Bosnia Genocide Case
A Handbook for Local Journalists in Crisis Areas
Introduction to the Hague Tribunal
Online Help
Guides to international law and language:
Legal Dictionary of Terms
Dictionary of International Law
Law.com Dictionary
Support
To support IWPR's work, contact Ria Burghardt, or make an ONLINE DONATION >>
IWPR thanks the following for their generous support:
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Norway Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Norway
Swedish International Development and Cooperation Agency (SIDA)Swedish Agency for International Development Cooperation (Sida)
Foreign and Commonwealth Office (UK)Foreign and Commonwealth Office, UK


© Institute for War & Peace Reporting
48 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8LT, UK
Tel: +44 (0)20 7831 1030    Fax: +44 (0)20 7831 1050

The opinions expressed in IWPR Online are those of the authors and do not
necessarily represent those of the Institute for War and Peace Reporting.

Registered as a charity in the United Kingdom (charity reg. no: 1027201, company reg. no: 2744185)