IWPR Home institute for war & peace reporting
   
 Advanced Search
building peace and democracy through free and fair media

Home
Programmes
Afghanistan
Afghan Recovery Report
Africa
Zimbabwe Crisis Reports
Caucasus
Caucasus Reporting Service
Cross Caucasus Network
Central Asia
Reporting Central Asia
News Briefing Central Asia
Human Rights Reporting
Central Asia Radio
International Justice
ICC - Africa Update
ICTY - Tribunal Update
Face à la Justice - RD Congo
Facing Justice - Uganda
On the Scale - Darfur
Iran
Mianeh Reports
Iraq
Iraqi Crisis Report
Pakistan
Open Minds
Philippines
Human Rights Reporting
Syria
Syria News Briefing
Multimedia
Resources
Books
Training
IWPR Comment
Kurt Schork Awards
Photo Galleries
Sahar Fund
Past Programmes
Past Publications
CIJ Trial Reports Archive
Links
RSS Feeds
Other IWPR sites
Academy
Mianeh
Open Minds Pakistan
Regional Media Network
Rights Reporting
IWPR on acebook
witter
 



ICTY - Tribunal Update
International Justice / ICTY home
Courtside

Oric

Bos-Hrv-Srp

Former Srebrenica fighter denies that the accused led organised military force.

By Helen Warrell in The Hague (TU No 424, 7-Oct-05)

A former Muslim fighter from near the Bosnian town of Srebrenica has testified in the trial of local wartime commander Naser Oric that forces in that area were loyal to their own individual leaders in 1992 and 1993, rather than to the accused.

Prosecutors mounting the case against Oric say that, following his appointment as commander of Srebrenica’s Territorial Defence, TO, in May 1992, the accused oversaw all units fighting around Srebrenica and in the neighbouring municipality of Bratunac.

Such claims lie at the heart of charges that Oric was responsible for crimes allegedly committed by his subordinates in these areas, including murders of prisoners and the destruction of ethnic Serb villages.

But this week’s witness – who testified under protective measures, with his identity hidden from public view – spoke in support of defence claims that Muslim forces in the Srebrenica area did not in fact coordinate with each other or report to a central commander during the early stages of the war in Bosnia.

The witness told judges that he had taken part in fighting in the area with a group of men from the nearby village of Glogova, under the command of one Ejub Golic. But he repeatedly denied that the group could be compared to a military battalion or company.

Asked if local fighters were formally assigned to their respective units, he replied, “No, the groups were formed because we organised ourselves.”

Defence lawyer Vasvija Vidovic presented the witness with a document first introduced into evidence during the prosecution stage of the trial. Allegedly drafted by the Srebrenica TO in December 1992 on Oric’s orders, it appeared to detail the formation of an “independent Glogova battalion” under the command of Golic and made up of conscripts from the Glogova area.

The witness replied that the information in the document could not possibly be correct and went on to say that he was sure Golic had not received written orders from Oric or any other person in 1992.

Far from being a structured, hierarchical military unit, he said, the Glogova group to which he belonged was in fact just an informal combat force which used just ten rifles to respond to daily shelling and infantry attacks launched by Bosnian Serb soldiers.

As an example of such aggression by Serb forces, the witness described how in May 1992, the Muslim inhabitants of Glogova were forced out of their village in a brutal assault in which houses were torched and 64 people were executed.

Those who survived the attack, he said, fled to the nearby village of Velika Glogova and the surrounding woods. While some people managed to squeeze into local houses, others were forced to sleep outdoors.

The witness went on to describe his role in an attack on the Serb village of Jezestica on August 8, 1992 – listed in the indictment as having been personally overseen by Oric and having involved the destruction of Serb homes.

He said the operation was launched with support from Bosnian army commander Nurif Rizvanovic, who had arrived in the area with 400 soldiers to help Golic’s limited forces.

The witness said he didn’t hear Rizvanovic speak about whose orders he was operating under, but said he had the impression that he was responsible to commanders in Tuzla rather than to Oric in Srebrenica.

Under further questioning from Vidovic, he firmly denied prosecution claims that TO units from the villages of Potocari, Suceska and Osmace – all apparently under Oric’s control – had taken part in the raid.

Later in his testimony, the witness said that his group did at one point come under Oric’s command – but that wasn’t until 1995, he added, long after the time period referred to in the indictment.

Given the chance to cross-examine the witness, prosecutor Joanne Richardson challenged his claims that he was unaware of Oric’s role as a commander in Srebrenica.

When she suggested that he must have spoken about Oric with people while living in the enclave from mid-1993 to 1995, he replied, “We couldn’t discuss every single person in Srebrenica, there were 40,000 people there.”

The testimony of this protected witness followed on from that of British doctor Simon Mardel, who carried out medical work in Srebrenica during the war and spoke at the end of last week about the horrific conditions he experienced in the besieged town.

It is part of the case being presented by Oric’s lawyers that their client was forced to operate under impossible conditions throughout his time in Srebrenica.

Describing how starvation and disease was rife, Mardel told judges that the local officials were struggling to deal with “the increasingly deteriorating conditions”.

Defence counsel John Jones quoted one of Mardel’s 1993 reports in which he wrote, “People are completely trapped. The water supply from higher up the valley is now cut off. The present situation can only be described as an impending holocaust.”

The doctor, who had previously worked in other crisis areas including Afghanistan and Ethopia, said “holocaust” was not a word he used lightly.

The protected witness will continue to give evidence on October 10.

Helen Warrell is an IWPR reporter in The Hague.


Feedback Form
IWPR greatly appreciates your feedback. Please tick the boxes where appropriate:
After reading the article I am more informed on the subject matter
The article influenced my view on the ICTY and/or international justice
I intend to use what I learned (in my work)
My work/education is in the field of:
IWPR may contact me to follow up
Your name (optional):
Your E-mail address (optional):



Subscribe
Past Reports
MonthIssue No.
Feb633-633
Jan630-632
MonthIssue No.
Dec627-629
Nov623-626
Oct618-622
Sep614-617
Aug612-613
Jul608-611
Jun604-607
Archive 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 00 99 98 97 96
Highlights
Facing Justice - UgandaFacing Justice - Uganda
Vacancies Available
On the Scale - DarfurOn the Scale - Darfur
Project Review Oct/Nov 2009
Kurt Schork Awards Videos
Kurt Schork Award Winners
A Handbook on Covering War Crimes Courts
In the News
Winnipeg Free Press"Now [the Taleban] appear to be able to launch their attacks even in the most heavily protected sections of [Kabul], "said IWPR Afghan project editor/trainer Jean MacKenzie.
McClatchy"The simple fact is that the condition of the economy has never played a major role in the minds of Iranian leaders or in Iran's national security equation," said IWPR contributor Omid Memarian on the prospect of tougher western sanctions.
BBC“I would like to imagine that at least a few senior politicians woke up this week to seriously wonder what kind of monsters they and their system have created over the years," said IWPR's Head of Asia Alan Davis, referring to Maguindanao massacre.
The New York TimesRecent double bombing in Baghdad has cast doubt on the government's ability to guarantee security and prompted fears such violence may affect voter turnout in anticipated January elections, writes iWPR reporter Ali Karim.
Past Highlights
Interview: Tribunal president on court’s completion strategy
Interview: ICJ Chief on Bosnia Genocide Case
A Handbook for Local Journalists in Crisis Areas
Introduction to the Hague Tribunal
Online Help
Guides to international law and language:
Legal Dictionary of Terms
Dictionary of International Law
Law.com Dictionary
Support
To support IWPR's work, contact Ria Burghardt, or make an ONLINE DONATION >>
IWPR thanks the following for their generous support:
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Norway Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Norway
Swedish International Development and Cooperation Agency (SIDA)Swedish Agency for International Development Cooperation (Sida)
Foreign and Commonwealth Office (UK)Foreign and Commonwealth Office, UK


© Institute for War & Peace Reporting
48 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8LT, UK
Tel: +44 (0)20 7831 1030    Fax: +44 (0)20 7831 1050

The opinions expressed in IWPR Online are those of the authors and do not
necessarily represent those of the Institute for War and Peace Reporting.

Registered as a charity in the United Kingdom (charity reg. no: 1027201, company reg. no: 2744185)