IWPR Home institute for war & peace reporting
   
 Advanced Search
building peace and democracy through free and fair media

Home
Programmes
Afghanistan
Afghan Recovery Report
Africa
Zimbabwe Crisis Reports
Caucasus
Caucasus Reporting Service
Cross Caucasus Network
Central Asia
Reporting Central Asia
News Briefing Central Asia
Human Rights Reporting
Central Asia Radio
International Justice
ICC - Africa Update
ICTY - Tribunal Update
Face à la Justice - RD Congo
Facing Justice - Uganda
On the Scale - Darfur
Iran
Mianeh Reports
Iraq
Iraqi Crisis Report
Pakistan
Open Minds
Philippines
Human Rights Reporting
Syria
Syria News Briefing
Multimedia
Resources
Books
Training
IWPR Comment
Kurt Schork Awards
Photo Galleries
Sahar Fund
Past Programmes
Past Publications
CIJ Trial Reports Archive
Links
RSS Feeds
Other IWPR sites
Academy
Mianeh
Open Minds Pakistan
Regional Media Network
Rights Reporting
IWPR on acebook
witter
 



Reporting Central Asia
Central Asia home

Kyrgyz Political Elite Hit by Infighting

Russian

Beneath surface of a simple personnel switch there is layer upon layer of political and regional rivalries.

By Asel Sultanalieva in Bishkek (RCA No. 552, 21-Oct-08)

Kyrgyz president Kurmanbek Bakiev’s choice of Adakhan Madumarov to head the powerful Security Council appears to be an attempt to coopt the former speaker of parliament and avert the possibility that he might join the opposition, local analysts say.

At the same time, both Madumarov’s comeback and the sudden departure of his predecessor Ismail Isakov are being seen as the outward signs of turbulence within the political elite, in which several rival factions are competing for the president’s attention.

Bakiev named Madumarov as secretary of the Security Council on October 15, five days after Isakov announced he was stepping down because he was unhappy with the president’s domestic, foreign and personnel policies. In particular, Isakov talked about “increasing signs of authoritarianism”, and the spread of corruption in the police and judiciary.

Isakov also spoke out against what he said were procedural irregularities in the October 5 local elections, in which the Jany Kyrgyzstan party he heads performed disappointingly. Jany Kyrgyzstan is a long-established group with a pro-government rather than opposition stance, and includes many prominent establishment figures within its ranks.

Some analysts say Jany Kyrgyzstan has felt slighted by the emergence of Bakiev’s Ak Jol party, which swept the board in the December 2007 parliamentary election just two months after it was set up.

In a statement on October 7, Jany Kyrgyzstan leaders blamed the Kyrgyz government and Ak Jol for the current economic crisis, in which the whole country is suffering periodic power-cuts, and threatened to stage protests in November if things did not improve.

President Bakiev was dismissive of the stand taken by Isakov. He suggested that his own criticism of Isakov’s work had left him feeling aggrieved.

However, many analysts see Isakov’s departure as a real blow to Bakiev, while Jany Kyrgyzstan’s threat to mount protests should be taken seriously.

“Isakov’s reputation is impeccable,” political analyst Orozbek Moldaliev told IWPR, noting in particular that Isakov’s time as defence minister prior to joining the Security Council had won him a lot of credit in the military.

“He and his Jany Kyrgyzstan party could win support regionally. As of today, there are real preconditions for nationwide political action,” said Moldaliev.

Chronic shortages of fuel, food and electricity are likely to get worse over the winter, and would provide a potent set of issues for anti-Bakiev protests, and Jany Kyrgyzstan might find strategic allies in opposition parties like Ata Meken and Ak Shumkar.

After months of silence, the opposition – which in past years repeatedly staged large demonstrations against Bakiev – has begun warning of fresh protests over the economic situation, and has indicated that it will work with anyone who shares its general aims. (For a recent attempt to capitalise on dissent within the regime, see Kyrgyz Opposition Rears Head Over Video Scandal, RCA No. 551, 08-Oct-08.)

Soon after Isakov’s resignation, Ata Meken leader Omurbek Tekebaev told the Bishkek Press Club that “there are issues on which politicians with polar opposite views can come together”.

According to Mukar Cholponbaev, himself a former speaker of parliament and now an independent political analyst, “Bakiev now needs to move towards a coalition government, constitutional reform and an early parliamentary election – that is how he will hold onto power. If he will fail to do this, then opposition forces will unite.”

Appointing Madumarov may have been a first attempt by Bakiev to address these issues.

Madumarov was a major force in the opposition movement which ousted President Askar Akaev in the March 2005 revolution and brought Bakiev to power. He served as speaker of parliament for a year until May 2008, when he was forced to step down because of a controversy over the refurbishment of the Kyrgyz parliament.

It gets more complex than that, though. While Bakiev and the opposition are at loggerheads, analysts say that within the political establishment there are a number of rival groupings vying for influence and plotting against one another other.

One faction, led by presidential aide Usen Sydykov, is believed to be at loggerheads with another group headed by the president’s son Maxim Bakiev and presidential chief of staff Medet Sadyrkulov. A third faction within the regime is led by the president’s brother Janysh Bakiev.

Regional allegiances are important in Kyrgyzstan. Most of the leading revolutionaries – and hence most of the current administration including the president – hail from the south. But these days, the Maxim Bakiev/Sadyrkulov faction is thought to represent northern interests.

By contrast, Sydykov’s group still includes many southerners, many of them leading lights in the 2005 revolution, and is linked to the Jany Kyrgyzstan party. The departure of one of them – Isakov – can thus be seen a blow to this faction and southern politicians generally, and a victory for the Maxim Bakiev/Sadyrkulov grouping.

As Alikbek Jekshenkulov, a leading figure in the opposition Movement for Justice, put it in a recent interview for RFE/RL, “The statement made by Isakov, one of the most influential southerners, shows that Bakiev is starting to lose [the support of] the southern elite.”

In that context, the president may have calculated that after losing Isakov, it was important not to gain another opponent in Madumarov.

A southerner, Madumarov is not known to be associated with either Sydykov or Jany Kyrgyzstan, but he clearly harboured a grievance – he was so annoyed by having to resign as speaker that he also stepped down as an ordinary member of parliament. If he had chosen to act, he might well have gravitated towards Jany Kyrgyzstan rather than to the opposition.

Appointing him to head the Security Council therefore kills two birds with one stone – it brings an influential politician back into the fold, and deprives both the opposition and Jany Kyrgyzstan of his potential support.

As Green Party member Erkin Bulekbaev told the Akipress news agency, “The appointment of Madumarov as head of the Security Council clearly shows that the president… is attempting to bring back influential politicians so that they don’t join the opposition.”

Asel Sultanalieva is a pseudonym for a journalist in Bishkek.




Subscribe
Past Reports
MonthIssue No.
Feb602-602
Jan600-601
MonthIssue No.
Dec597-599
Nov594-596
Oct590-593
Sep588-589
Aug586-587
Jul582-585
Jun579-581
May576-578
Apr573-575
Archive 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 00
Highlights
Facing Justice - UgandaFacing Justice - Uganda
Vacancies Available
On the Scale - DarfurOn the Scale - Darfur
Project Review Oct/Nov 2009
Kurt Schork Awards Videos
Kurt Schork Award Winners
Reporter Shortlisted for Regional Prize
In the News
Winnipeg Free Press"Now [the Taleban] appear to be able to launch their attacks even in the most heavily protected sections of [Kabul], "said IWPR Afghan project editor/trainer Jean MacKenzie.
McClatchy"The simple fact is that the condition of the economy has never played a major role in the minds of Iranian leaders or in Iran's national security equation," said IWPR contributor Omid Memarian on the prospect of tougher western sanctions.
BBC“I would like to imagine that at least a few senior politicians woke up this week to seriously wonder what kind of monsters they and their system have created over the years," said IWPR's Head of Asia Alan Davis, referring to Maguindanao massacre.
The New York TimesRecent double bombing in Baghdad has cast doubt on the government's ability to guarantee security and prompted fears such violence may affect voter turnout in anticipated January elections, writes iWPR reporter Ali Karim.
Support
To support IWPR's work in Central Asia, contact Ria Burghardt, or make an ONLINE DONATION >>
IWPR thanks the following for their generous support:
UK Foreign & Commonwealth OfficeUK Foreign and Commonwealth Office
US Department of StateUS Department of State
Open Society InstituteOpen Society Institute (OSI)



© Institute for War & Peace Reporting
48 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8LT, UK
Tel: +44 (0)20 7831 1030    Fax: +44 (0)20 7831 1050

The opinions expressed in IWPR Online are those of the authors and do not
necessarily represent those of the Institute for War and Peace Reporting.

Registered as a charity in the United Kingdom (charity reg. no: 1027201, company reg. no: 2744185)