IWPR Home institute for war & peace reporting
   
 Advanced Search
building peace and democracy through free and fair media

Home
Programmes
Afghanistan
Afghan Recovery Report
Africa
Zimbabwe Crisis Reports
Caucasus
Caucasus Reporting Service
Cross Caucasus Network
Central Asia
Reporting Central Asia
News Briefing Central Asia
Human Rights Reporting
Central Asia Radio
International Justice
ICC - Africa Update
ICTY - Tribunal Update
Face à la Justice - RD Congo
Facing Justice - Uganda
On the Scale - Darfur
Iran
Mianeh Reports
Iraq
Iraqi Crisis Report
Pakistan
Open Minds
Philippines
Human Rights Reporting
Syria
Syria News Briefing
Multimedia
Resources
Books
Training
IWPR Comment
Kurt Schork Awards
Photo Galleries
Sahar Fund
Past Programmes
Past Publications
CIJ Trial Reports Archive
Links
RSS Feeds
Other IWPR sites
Academy
Mianeh
Open Minds Pakistan
Regional Media Network
Rights Reporting
IWPR on acebook
witter
 



Caucasus Reporting Service
Caucasus home

South Ossetians Puzzled by Leaders

Locals say officials were not ready for independence and may not even want it.

By Alan Tskhurbaev in Tskhinval (CRS No. 507, 21-Aug-09)

A year ago, Moscow recognised South Ossetia as an independent state, but the population of the tiny Caucasus country has still not figured out what that is supposed to mean.

South Ossetians celebrated through the night on August 26 last year when they heard Russia had recognised their independence, which they proclaimed after winning a war against Georgian troops in 1991-2.

A year later, they say they feel safer knowing Russia will protect them, but locals say the government was not ready for an independent status and may not even want it.

“Perhaps it is about adapting to the new circumstances, but I think we can now say that the readiness of our government for independence was less than 40 per cent,” said Alan Parastayev, a political commentator in Tskhinval.

“The main reason for this is that most people who are in power did not believe in our independence and what happened was for them entirely unexpected.”

President Eduard Kokoity said several times before the war that broke out in South Ossetia last August, when Russia intervened to drive out Georgian troops, that he wanted his state to unite with Ossetians living north of the mountains as part of Russia.

Earlier this month, not long before the anniversary of the war, he repeated the same words, suggesting that his own commitment to independence is weak.

“We will build our statehood, but we will be in a union with Russia. We do not rule out that we could enter the Russian Federation,” he told western journalists, although he retracted his words the next day, claiming the journalists had misunderstood him.

It is not surprising perhaps that some locals are confused by where their government is taking them, especially since it is not just Kokoity making such comments. Just days after the August War, parliament speaker Znaur Gassiev said South Ossetia would become part of Russia “in the course of the next few years, or even sooner”.

Although almost all South Ossetians have Russian passports and are grateful to Moscow for its support in the war last year, that does not mean they want their little country to become part of Russia.

“I am categorically against that,” said Timur Tskhovrebov, editor of 21st century, South Ossetia’s only independent newspaper.

“Our freedom cost us dear and we will not give it up for anything. A union with Russia would only be possible on equal terms.”

Local residents also wonder what the point of independence was, since it has failed to bring them much reconstruction – in marked contrast to Georgia proper, where international money has poured in to provide help and accommodation for those displaced by the war. Restoration work in Tskhinval only started this summer, a year after the war started.

“We need to get up from the warm bed of humanitarian aid and move to the full and autonomous life of a recognised state,” said Parastayev

But even the political life of the republic since recognition has not been smooth. Parliamentary elections in May could have been a showcase for the region, but were mired in scandal after almost all the opposition leaders were barred from running. As a result, the parliament is packed with Kokoity loyalists.

The government also had a rocky time. The republic lacked a prime minister for almost a year, and then on August 5 Vadim Brovtsev, the head of a major construction company from the Russian city of Chelyabinsk, was appointed to the post, despite having no previous connection to South Ossetia at all.

“He will have to be a genius to make a government capable of functioning since he does not know anyone here at all,” said Tskhovrebov.

But the increased role of Russia in South Ossetia could, according to political analyst Vissarion Aseyev, help society to start to demand more from the government.

“There used to be this feeling that we were at war and demanding something from the government was not right. But this barrier has been removed. The security issue is resolved and now we can move to creating our state. People have become more outspoken. New aims and demands have appeared. If before people thought only of bread, now they are thinking about butter too,” he said.

Tskhovrebov agreed, “We have escaped from not only the external enemy, but also from the dictatorship of the government. The new conditions will dictate new responsibilities to the authorities, and slowly everything will become more civilised.”

Alan Tskhurbaev is a freelance journalist based in Vladikavkaz.



Subscribe
Past Reports
MonthIssue No.
Feb530-530
Jan526-529
MonthIssue No.
Dec522-525
Nov518-521
Oct513-517
Sep509-512
Aug505-508
Jul501-504
Archive 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 00 99
Highlights
Facing Justice - UgandaFacing Justice - Uganda
On the Scale - DarfurOn the Scale - Darfur
Vacancies Available
Project Review Oct/Nov 2009
Kurt Schork Awards Videos
Kurt Schork Award Winners
Learning About Risk
Media Bias Claims in Georgia Exposed
Georgia War Anniversary
Karabakh Focus
Karabakh Refugees
Photo Essays
Learning About Risk
IWPR Georgia in Action
View more >>
Past Highlights
Regional Media Network
Handbook for Local Journalists
War and Peace in the Caucasus
In the News
Winnipeg Free Press"Now [the Taleban] appear to be able to launch their attacks even in the most heavily protected sections of [Kabul], "said IWPR Afghan project editor/trainer Jean MacKenzie.
McClatchy"The simple fact is that the condition of the economy has never played a major role in the minds of Iranian leaders or in Iran's national security equation," said IWPR contributor Omid Memarian on the prospect of tougher western sanctions.
BBC“I would like to imagine that at least a few senior politicians woke up this week to seriously wonder what kind of monsters they and their system have created over the years," said IWPR's Head of Asia Alan Davis, referring to Maguindanao massacre.
The New York TimesRecent double bombing in Baghdad has cast doubt on the government's ability to guarantee security and prompted fears such violence may affect voter turnout in anticipated January elections, writes iWPR reporter Ali Karim.
Support
To support IWPR's work in Caucasus, contact Ria Burghardt, or make an ONLINE DONATION >>
IWPR thanks the following for their generous support:
Community Fund (UK)Community Fund (UK)
European Commission This project is co-funded by the European Union
Dutch Ministry for Development CooperationDutch Ministry for Development Cooperation
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of DenmarkMinistry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark



© Institute for War & Peace Reporting
48 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8LT, UK
Tel: +44 (0)20 7831 1030    Fax: +44 (0)20 7831 1050

The opinions expressed in IWPR Online are those of the authors and do not
necessarily represent those of the Institute for War and Peace Reporting.

Registered as a charity in the United Kingdom (charity reg. no: 1027201, company reg. no: 2744185)