IWPR Home institute for war & peace reporting
   
 Advanced Search
building peace and democracy through free and fair media

Home
Programmes
Afghanistan
Afghan Recovery Report
Africa
Zimbabwe Crisis Reports
Caucasus
Caucasus Reporting Service
Cross Caucasus Network
Central Asia
Reporting Central Asia
News Briefing Central Asia
Human Rights Reporting
Central Asia Radio
International Justice
ICC - Africa Update
ICTY - Tribunal Update
Face à la Justice - RD Congo
Facing Justice - Uganda
On the Scale - Darfur
Iran
Mianeh Reports
Iraq
Iraqi Crisis Report
Pakistan
Open Minds
Philippines
Human Rights Reporting
Syria
Syria News Briefing
Multimedia
Resources
Books
Training
IWPR Comment
Kurt Schork Awards
Photo Galleries
Sahar Fund
Past Programmes
Past Publications
CIJ Trial Reports Archive
Links
RSS Feeds
Other IWPR sites
Academy
Mianeh
Open Minds Pakistan
Regional Media Network
Rights Reporting
IWPR on acebook
witter
 



Caucasus Reporting Service
Caucasus home

Georgia Opposition Brush Aside Call for Dialogue

Russian

Confident they can mobilise the masses on April 9, president’s foes dismiss calls for talks as too late in the day.

By Tamar Kadagidze in Tbilisi (CRS No. 487, 3-Apr-09)

With a week left before the Georgian opposition plans to start street protests aimed at forcing President Mikheil Saakashvili to step down, opposition leaders have dismissed calls for dialogue as belated.

Thirteen opposition parties that plan to take part in the April 9 protests have signed a memorandum in which they pledged a united front against Saakashvili’s rule.

The core of the opposition movement is led by two former allies of Saakashvili: Irakli Alasania, who represented Georgia in the United Nations before forming the Alliance for Georgia several months ago; and the former speaker of the Georgian parliament, Nino Burjanadze, now leader of the Democratic Movement – United Georgia.

Last week, the authorities, who until then had appeared unruffled by opposition preparations, released a video showing several opposition activists, allegedly associated with Burjanadze’s party, trying to buy automatic guns and pistols furnished with silencers.

They were also discussing the possibility of staging provocations on April 9.

The opposition dismissed the footage as a montage produced by the interior ministry to discredit them ahead of the rally.

Burjanadze said the authorities’ claims of having rumbled a dangerous plot were “absurd”, while confirming that many of the people on the video were members of her party.

But Saakashvili insisted the film was no montage, and had revealed plans for serious acts of violence.

The president thanked the police for their “highly effective work over the last weeks”, which he said had “undermined plans to create mass disorder and destabilise the situation”.

Following publication of the video, the opposition and government traded arguments over the affair, in a bid to woo uncommitted members of the public.

The opposition recalled the events of November 2007, when the authorities, after violently breaking up opposition protests, published video and audio footage that they said exposed the organisers of the protests as Kremlin agents.

Many people today remain sceptical of the government’s latest version of events. “I don’t believe a single word the authorities say,” one Tbilisi resident, named Mamuka, said.

“Our government rivals cinema makers when it comes to producing thrillers. It just wants to frighten people, to keep them out of the streets.”

The authorities, in turn, compare the current situation to the virtual civil war that raged in Georgia in the early Nineties, when the opposition overthrew the then president Zviad Gamsakhurdia.

For several days, Georgian TV channels have been running footage of episodes from the conflict.

Petre Tsiskarishvili, leader of the pro-government majority in parliament, told IWPR, “There are people in Georgia who want to repeat the scenario of 18 years ago.”

“I remember the civil war of the early Nineties as if it happened yesterday,” one resident of the capital said.

“Like they do today, the opposition then said they wouldn’t shoot…History is repeating itself.”

One of the opposition leaders, Irakli Alasania, denied their plans for April 9 envisaged violence.

“It’s difficult to predict how it all will develop,” he said. “But one thing is clear: the opposition feels responsible for the process, and our main aim is to avoid engaging in a clash with law-enforcement bodies.”

Some government officials, meanwhile, are now calling for last-minute talks.

“Dialogue is the only way to defuse the crisis,” the speaker of parliament, David Bakradze, said, on a visit to the United States. “We are ready for this kind of dialogue.”

Many well-known public figures have added their voices to such calls.

Pro-government TV channels have shown them urging both sides to come to their senses and avoid repeating the mistakes of the past.

But the opposition has dismissed the calls as belated, saying they will not be deflected from their plans.

“There’s going to be no dialogue until April 9,” Saakashvili’s former foreign minister, Salome Zurabishvili, now leader of the Georgia’s Path party, said.

“A dialogue is possible only after Saakashvili goes away… Those, who want to negotiate [with the government] now, are not the opposition.”

On April 1, the opposition officially declined the government’s proposal for talks in a joint statement.

“In the current situation, a peaceful change of power through constitutional means is the only issue for dialogue that we see,” the statement said. “And we’re prepared to talk publicly only… with Saakashvili.”

According to commentator Ia Antadze a focus for eventual negotiations, should they happen, could be on securing a date for early parliamentary elections.

But Antadze said this might well play to the president’s strengths. “[In that case], Saakashvili might be said to have won this battle with the opposition before it has even begun, as he knows how to win elections in Georgia,” he said.

Political analyst Ramaz Sakvarelidze agreed that no dialogue was likely to start before April 9, when the numbers taking to the streets would decide almost everything.

“Whether or not the dialogue begins, and, if it does, what it will be about, largely depends on the people,” he said.

“If many people will take out to streets on April 9, the authorities will be forced to make compromise.

“If the people are not many, then it will be the opposition that will have to seek a dialogue.”

Tamar Kadagidze is a freelance journalist in Tbilisi.



Subscribe
Past Reports
MonthIssue No.
Feb530-530
Jan526-529
MonthIssue No.
Dec522-525
Nov518-521
Oct513-517
Sep509-512
Aug505-508
Jul501-504
Archive 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 00 99
Highlights
Facing Justice - UgandaFacing Justice - Uganda
On the Scale - DarfurOn the Scale - Darfur
Vacancies Available
Project Review Oct/Nov 2009
Kurt Schork Awards Videos
Kurt Schork Award Winners
Learning About Risk
Media Bias Claims in Georgia Exposed
Georgia War Anniversary
Karabakh Focus
Karabakh Refugees
Photo Essays
Learning About Risk
IWPR Georgia in Action
View more >>
Past Highlights
Regional Media Network
Handbook for Local Journalists
War and Peace in the Caucasus
In the News
Winnipeg Free Press"Now [the Taleban] appear to be able to launch their attacks even in the most heavily protected sections of [Kabul], "said IWPR Afghan project editor/trainer Jean MacKenzie.
McClatchy"The simple fact is that the condition of the economy has never played a major role in the minds of Iranian leaders or in Iran's national security equation," said IWPR contributor Omid Memarian on the prospect of tougher western sanctions.
BBC“I would like to imagine that at least a few senior politicians woke up this week to seriously wonder what kind of monsters they and their system have created over the years," said IWPR's Head of Asia Alan Davis, referring to Maguindanao massacre.
The New York TimesRecent double bombing in Baghdad has cast doubt on the government's ability to guarantee security and prompted fears such violence may affect voter turnout in anticipated January elections, writes iWPR reporter Ali Karim.
Support
To support IWPR's work in Caucasus, contact Ria Burghardt, or make an ONLINE DONATION >>
IWPR thanks the following for their generous support:
Community Fund (UK)Community Fund (UK)
European Commission This project is co-funded by the European Union
Dutch Ministry for Development CooperationDutch Ministry for Development Cooperation
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of DenmarkMinistry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark



© Institute for War & Peace Reporting
48 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8LT, UK
Tel: +44 (0)20 7831 1030    Fax: +44 (0)20 7831 1050

The opinions expressed in IWPR Online are those of the authors and do not
necessarily represent those of the Institute for War and Peace Reporting.

Registered as a charity in the United Kingdom (charity reg. no: 1027201, company reg. no: 2744185)